Legal Opinion

Downtown Palo Alto Committee for Fair Assessment v. City Council

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 28, 1986No. A024556PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

NEWSOM, J.

Appellants are operators of businesses in the downtown area of the City of Palo Alto (hereafter sometimes the City) who are affected by an ordinance enacted by respondent creating a Downtown Business Improvement Area and permitting annual charges to be assessed against businesses in the designated improvement area. By way of a petition for writ of mandate filed in Santa Clara County Superior Court, appellants challenged the validity of the ordinance on numerous grounds.

After a hearing at which documentary and testimonial evidence was introduced, the trial court found the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Morris v. County of MarinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  2. City and County of San Francisco v. CooperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. FalesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Paul v. Milk Depots, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Edwards v. SteeleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Morehart v. County of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Wilson & Wilson v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  3. ABBA Rubber Co. v. SeaquistCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  4. Citizens for Open Government v. City of LodiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  5. Woodward Park Homeowners Ass'n v. Garreks, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2000

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API