Legal Opinion
H. W. Rohl Co. v. County of San Diego
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 6, 1963No. Civ. 6783PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MONROE, J. pro tem. *
By the provisions of ordinance Number 2020 (N.S.) it is provided that the use of real estate in the unincorporated area of San Diego County for the purpose of quarrying rock, sand and gravel, and for the operation of a rock crushing and processing plant is prohibited unless a use permit has been granted by the board of supervisors. The plaintiff corporation made application for such permit in order to establish that type of business upon a tract of real estate in an unincorporated and unzoned area of the county. In accordance with the provisions of the ordinance a hearing…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Fascination, Inc. v. HooverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Metcalf v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Rubin v. Board of DirectorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Floresta, Inc. v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Garden Grove Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses v. City of Garden GroveCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gong v. City of FremontCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Taylor v. SwansonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Elysium Institute, Inc. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Elysium Institute, Inc. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991