Legal Opinion
Arway v. Bloom
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided November 10, 1992No. 11057PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFoti, J.
The defendants appeal from the decision of the trial court sustaining the plaintiffs’ appeal from the approval of a site plan and special permit application by the zoning commission of the town of Redding.
The following facts are relevant to this appeal. The defendants, Richard and Walter S. Bloom (applicants), are the contract purchasers of 35.77 acres of land located on Starrs Ridge Road in the town of Redding.1 The defendant zoning commission is that town’s duly authorized zoning authority. The plaintiffs, all of whom are Redding residents, own land in proximity to the subject property.2 On…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Rhodes v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- State v. BlaskoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- State v. KozlowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Capalbo v. Planning & Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- All Brand Importers, Inc. v. Department of Liquor ControlSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Sharp v. Wyatt, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Black v. London & Egazarian Associates, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Gevers v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Foti v. RichardsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Arway v. BloomSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.