Legal Opinion

Harbinson v. Affeldt

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 24, 1946No. Civ. 7251PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, P. J.

This is an appeal from an order denying defendants’ motion for a change of place of trial to the county of their residence.

The complaint, which was' filed in Sacramento County, alleges that plaintiffs and defendants entered into a written contract by which defendants agreed to buy from plaintiffs certain real property in Sacramento County, and also agreed to care for the premises and irrigate same; that defendants defaulted in their payments, and plaintiffs resumed possession; that defendants also failed to care for and irrigate said land, with the result that the land and a crop growing…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. McKenzie v. BarlingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Sourbis v. RhoadsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  3. Lakeshore Cattle Co. v. Modoc Land & Livestock Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
  4. California Collection Agency, Inc. v. FontanaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  5. Mitchell v. KimCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Carnation Co. v. El Rey Cheese Co.California Court of Appeal · 1948
  2. Dallman Supply Co. v. SweetCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  3. Carruthers v. Crown Products Co.California Court of Appeal · 1948
  4. City of Long Beach v. Lakewood ParkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  5. Credit Bureau of San Diego, Inc. v. ClarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API