Legal Opinion
City of Long Beach v. Lakewood Park
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 22, 1953No. Civ. No. 19432PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCOTT (Robert H.), J. pro tem.
Plaintiff appeals from an order made under section 394 of the Code of Civil Procedure granting a motion by certain defendants to transfer its proceedings in eminent domain to another county. The suit was filed in Los Angeles County, where the property is located, and by this order was transferred to Orange County.
Appellant’s first contention is that section 394 of the Code of Civil Procedure is inapplicable to the situation in *597the ease before us. That section provides in part: “Whenever an action or proceeding is brought by a . . . city, against a resident of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hale v. BohannonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- City of Oakland v. DarbeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- City of Stockton v. EllingwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- Mono Power Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
- City of Santa Rosa v. Fountain Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Georgetown Divide Public Utility District v. BacchiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962