Legal Opinion

Carruthers v. Crown Products Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 24, 1948No. Civ. 16487PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

/ VALLÉE, J.

Appeal from an order changing the place of trial of the action from the county of Los Angeles to the county of Riverside on the ground that the convenience of witnesses and the ends of justice would be promoted by the change.

The action is for breach of contract. The motion for a change of place of trial was made by the plaintiff on the ground stated. As a trial court had broad discretion in determining a motion of this character the only question presented is whether the court arbitrarily abused its discretion in granting the motion. (Rosicrucian Fellowship v. Rosicrucian etc.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Goossen v. CliftonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  2. Pascoe v. BakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Willingham v. PecoraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  4. Lakeshore Cattle Co. v. Modoc Land & Livestock Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Barnett v. United Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Nanny v. Ruby Lighting Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1952
  2. Churchill v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  3. E. C. Livingston Co. v. Blythe Alfalfa Growers Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  4. Hecker v. RossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API