Legal Opinion

Kahn v. American Cone & Pretzel Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 26, 1950No. Appeal, 180PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Jones,

In this case, the plaintiff, a stockholder of a West Virginia corporation, registered to do business in Pennsylvania, brought suit in mandamus in the court below to compel the corporation and its officers to allow him to inspect such of the corporation’s books and records as would disclose the names and addresses of the company’s stockholders. The motive for the effort, as found by the court below, was that the plaintiff wished to form a protective committee of preferred stockholders to act in the interest of his investment. The two officers of the corporation…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Machen v. Machen & Mayer Electrical Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  2. Hodder v. George Hogg Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  3. Hauser v. York Water Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  4. Thompson v. Southern Connellsville Coke Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  5. Conerty v. Butler County Oil Refining Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Plum v. Tampax, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  2. Goldman v. Trans-United Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  3. Valtz v. Penta Investment Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1983
  4. Colvin v. Somat Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. Hood v. MeiningerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API