Hood v. Meininger
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mb. Justice Chidsey,
These three actions of assumpsit were brought to recover damages for breach of contract and were tried together. The appellant, Margaret Meininger, who was the plaintiff in two of the cases in the court below and defendant in the third, successively employed three independent contractors, appellees herein, to repair and remodel certain buildings on her farm in Perkasie, Pennsylvania.
The first contractor, appellee Robert Gerling, entered into an oral contract with the appellant in February, 1948 to make these alterations and improvements. After work had progressed…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Singerly v. ThayerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1885
- Arlotte v. National Liberty InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Ehrlich v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
- Commonwealth Trust Co. v. Hachmeister Lind Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Howley v. Scranton Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- St. Paul at Chase Corp. v. Manufacturers Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
- Universal Builders, Inc. v. Moon Motor Lodge, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Magar v. Lifetime, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Commonwealth v. BERGERCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Hartford Electric Applicators of Thermalux, Inc. v. AldenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.