Legal Opinion

Plum v. Tampax, Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 4, 1960No. Appeal, 149PublishedCited by 106 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mb. Justice Cohen,

Plaintiff commenced this action by writ of foreign attachment, naming certain garnishees. She then filed a complaint in equity against the defendant for an accounting. By preliminary objections defendant challenged the jurisdiction of the court below to adjudicate the matter, asserting that all of the relief sought by the plaintiff involved the internal affairs of a foreign corporation. The lower court dismissed the complaint, and this appeal under the Act of March 5, 1925, P. L. 23, 12 PS §672, followed.

At the outset we note that the question raised by the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Koster v. (American) Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Loftus v. LeeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  4. Winsor v. United Air Lines, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1958
  5. Fairchild Engine & Airplane Corp. v. Bellanca Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by106 opinions

  1. Okkerse v. HoweSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Reyno v. Piper Aircraft Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
  3. Martinez v. E.i. Dupont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2014
  4. Louis Hoffman v. Allan N. GobermanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
  5. Petty v. Suburban General HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

101 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API