Conerty v. Butler County Oil Refining Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Chief Justice Moschzisker,. There are four plaintiffs in this case, two being original parties and the others intervenors by consent of the court below; they were awarded a mandamus ordering defendant company and certain of its officials to permit them, either in person or through their agents, clerks, attorneys, accountants and auditors, to examine the corporation’s books and records, so that they might obtain such information of its affairs and financial condition as would enable them to confer with other stockholders and properly draft a bill in equity against the company and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Wettengel v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Cunliffe v. Consumers Ass'n of AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Machen v. Machen & Mayer Electrical Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
- Hodder v. George Hogg Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
- Franklin National Bank v. Kennerly Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Kroese v. General Steel Castings CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
- State Ex Rel. Weede v. Iowa Southern Utilities Co. of DelawareSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
- Strassburger v. Philadelphia Record Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Kahn v. American Cone & Pretzel Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
- Ruby, Exr. v. Penn Fibre Bd. Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.