Legal Opinion

Hodder v. George Hogg Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 4, 1909No. Appeal, No. 181PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Appeal, No. 181, Oct. T., 1908, by defendant, from order of O. P. No. 2, Allegheny Co., April T., 1908, No. 817, granting petition for mandamus in case of William Titus Hodder v. George Hogg Company. Petition for mandamus. Before Frazer, P. J. The opinion of the Supreme Court states the facts. Error assigned was order granting mandamus.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Potter,

William Titus Hodder is the owner of forty shares of the capital stock of the'George Hogg Company. Alleging mismanagement of the corporation and improper use of its funds, and the denial by the officers of the company of his right to examine the books, he filed a petition for a writ of alternative mandamus against the company and its officers, to compel the defendant to give the petitioner, or his representative, access to the books of the corporation. Respondents filed an answer, and made return to the petition, and upon demurrer thereto the court below awarded a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kuhbach v. Irving Cut Glass Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Hagy v. Premier Manufacturing Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  2. Goldman v. Trans-United Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  3. Hauser v. York Water Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  4. Strassburger v. Philadelphia Record Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  5. Kahn v. American Cone & Pretzel Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API