Legal Opinion
Flaherty v. Independent School District No. 2144
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided April 14, 1998No. C3-97-1281PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WILLIS, Judge.
Relator Debra Flaherty seeks review by writ of certiorari of respondent school district’s determination that her 79 hours of nonsubstitute work during the 1993-94 academic year did not constitute a year of probationary employment. We reverse.
FACTS
Relator Debra Flaherty began work as a substitute teacher for respondent Chisago Lakes school district in the fall of 1993. Her substitute teaching contract explicitly provided that the work did not count as probationary employment for purposes of obtaining continuing contract .status. Beginning September 8, 1993, and continuing…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Hibbing Education Ass'n v. Public Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Dokmo v. Independent School District No. 11Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Van Asperen v. Darling Olds, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- McSherry v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
- Engstrom v. FARMERS & BANKERS LIFE INSURANCE CO.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Northern States Power Co. v. City of Mendota HeightsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
- Christopher v. Windom Area School BoardCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
- Emanuel v. Independent School District No. 273Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- Washington v. Independent School District No. 625Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- Fedie v. Mid-Century Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.