Tulsa Rig, Reel & Mfg. Co. v. Arnold
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from Superior Court, Tulsa County; M. A. Breckenridge, Judge, # Action by John H. Arnold and Elta Arnold against the Tulsa Rig, Reel & Manufacturing Company. Judgment for the plaintiffs, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
SHARP, O. J.
On June 1, 1911, John H. Arnold and Elta B. Arnold commenced their action in replevin against the Tulsa Rig, Reel & Manufacturing Company to recover the possession of certain specified timbers and irons which formed the parts of certain “rig patterns.” The plaintiffs alleged in the ordinary form that they were the owners and entitled to the immediate possession of said property, which is described with much detail. The defendant answered, alleging that on May 13, 1911, and subsequent to the date of the transaction through which plaintiffs claimed to be entitled to the property,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Brook v. BaylessSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898
- Robinson & Co. v. StinerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Olson v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898
- Olson v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1897
- Gilbert v. StephensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Wilson Motor Co. v. DunnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Tulsa Rig, Reel & Manufacturing Co. v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Essex v. FifeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- First Nat. Bank of Wellston v. KreuzbergSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Brown v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.