Legal Opinion

Tulsa Rig, Reel & Manufacturing Co. v. Arnold

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 25, 1923No. 12283PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

ESTES, C.

Defendants in error, Arnold and his wife, as plaintiffs below, commenced this action against Tulsa Rig, Reel & Manufacturing Company, a corporation, plaintiff in error, as defendant below, alleging, in substance, that they made an agreement with said company to sell and transfer to it 25 shares of stock owned by the Arnolds, for and in consideration of certain rig irons, rig timbers, and rig lumber to be delivered to them from the yards of the company at Osage, and also certain accounts to be assigned to them for collection, said Arnolds to pay $300 in cash to the company…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. William W. Bierce, Ltd. v. HutchinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Morris v. . RexfordNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  3. Northern Assurance Co. of London v. Grand View Building Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  4. Kinney v. . KiernanNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  5. Bunch v. GraveIndiana Supreme Court · 1887

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Centorp Corp. v. Gulf Production Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  2. Whitney v. WhitneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  3. Powell v. ChastainSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  4. Miller v. RobertsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  5. Crane v. OwensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API