Legal Opinion
Olson v. Thompson
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 18, 1898PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
On Petition for Re-Hearing.
Opinion of the court by
Tarsxey, J.:
The facts in this case are sufficiently stated in the former decision of this court. (Olson v. Thompson, this volume, p. 74.) By that decision the rule-was announced that:
“The maker of a promissory note is not the owner or entitled to the immediate possession thereof unless the-same has been paid or cancelled by a court; and until such payment or order of cancellation, an action of re-plevin for the recovery of the possession thereof by the-maker against the payee, will not lie.”
After a careful re-examination of the point involved…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Sigler v. HidySupreme Court of Iowa · 1881
3Cited by11 opinions
- Mathews v. SniggsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Columbia Bank & Trust Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- London & Lancashire Indemnity Co. v. CourtneyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
- Dysart v. EnslowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898
- Tulsa Rig, Reel & Mfg. Co. v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.