Legal Opinion

Brown v. Jones

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 15, 1943No. 30445PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWelch, J.

Fred Jones brought action in replevin to recover possession of an automobile for purpose of foreclosure under chattel mortgage. The action was instituted on April 29, 1940. After obtaining possession under writ of re-plevin, and on May 9, 1940, an amended petition was filed in which it was alleged that the note and mortgage had theretofore been assigned to another, and had then been reassigned to plaintiff. Judgment was for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

It is contended that the trial court erred in striking defendant’s cross-petition. Therein defendant asserted that plaintiff, in inducing…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Wilson Motor Co. v. DunnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  2. Cit. State Bank of Lawton v. Chattanooga State BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  3. Hutchings v. CobbleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  4. Colonial Jewelry Co. v. BridgesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  5. McFadyen and Brown v. MastersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1901

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Federal Deposit Insurance v. First Mortgage InvestorsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  2. American Perforating Co. v. Oklahoma State BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
  3. McGee v. CampbellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API