Legal Opinion
Baggett v. Hewlett-Packard Co.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided October 30, 2007No. Case SACV 07-0667-AG(RNBx)PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING IN PART AND GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
ANDREW J. GUILFORD, District Judge.
Before the Court is the Motion of Defendant Hewlett-Packard Company to Dismiss Plaintiffs Class Action Complaint (“Motion”). After considering the moving, opposing, and reply papers, and oral argument by the parties, the Court DENIES in part and GRANTS in part without leave to amend Defendant’s Motion.
BACKGROUND
The Complaint sets forth the following facts, which for this Motion, the Court accepts as true.
In 2005, Plaintiff purchased an HP Las-erJet…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. BroudoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Theodore C. Swartz v. Kpmg Llp, and Presidio Advisory Services Inc. Deutsche Bank Ag Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Wilson v. Hewlett-Packard Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Arcand v. Brother International Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2009
- In Re Toyota Motor Corp. Unintended Acceleration Marketing, Sales Practices, & Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2010
- In re Carrier IQ, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
- MacDonald v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.