Legal Opinion
Wilson v. Hewlett-Packard Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 16, 2012No. 17-55573PublishedCited by 524 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DUFFY, District Judge:
Plaintiffs Cass Wilson and Douglas Kruschen (“Plaintiffs”) appeal the dismissal of their second amended complaint alleging that Hewlett-Packard (“HP”) concealed a design defect in its Pavilion Notebook computers (the “Laptops”) that manifested after the expiration of the warranty and created an unreasonable safety hazard in violation of California’s Consumers Legal Remedies Act (“CLRA”), Cal. Civ.Code § 1750 et seq., and Unfair Competition Law (“UCL”), Cal. Bus. & Prof.Code § 17200 et seq. The District Court dismissed the second amended complaint, holding that…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Sprewell v. Golden State WarriorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
- Daugherty v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by524 opinions
- Boris Levitt v. Yelp! Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- George Williams v. Yamaha Motor Corp. USACourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Margie Daniel v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Robert Hodsdon v. Mars, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Amanda Sateriale v. R J Reynolds Tobacco CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
519 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.