In Re Toyota Motor Corp. Unintended Acceleration Marketing, Sales Practices, & Products Liability Litigation
District Court, C.D. California
This document relates to: All economic loss cases.
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION TO STRIKE
JAMES V. SELNA, District Judge.
Table of Contents
I. Factual Allegations......................................................1156
II. Article III Standing......................................................1160
A. A Manifested SUA Defect Is Not Necessary for Standing.................1161
B. Pleading a Cognizable Loss under a “Benefit of the Bargain” Theory.... 1164
C. Lead Plaintiffs Must Plead a Cognizable Loss under a “Benefit of the Bargain” Theory..................................................1166
D…
2Cases cited101 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by90 opinions
- Margie Daniel v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- In re Carrier IQ, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
- In re Conagra Foods, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2015
- Cholakyan v. MERCEDES-BENZ USA, LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2011
- In re Nexus 6P Prods. Liab. Litig.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.