Legal Opinion

In Re Toyota Motor Corp. Unintended Acceleration Marketing, Sales Practices, & Products Liability Litigation

District Court, C.D. California

Decided November 30, 2010No. Case 8:10ML 02151 JVS (FMOx)PublishedCited by 90 opinions

This document relates to: All economic loss cases.

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION TO STRIKE

JAMES V. SELNA, District Judge.

Table of Contents

I. Factual Allegations......................................................1156

II. Article III Standing......................................................1160

A. A Manifested SUA Defect Is Not Necessary for Standing.................1161

B. Pleading a Cognizable Loss under a “Benefit of the Bargain” Theory.... 1164

C. Lead Plaintiffs Must Plead a Cognizable Loss under a “Benefit of the Bargain” Theory..................................................1166

D…

2Cases cited101 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by90 opinions

  1. Margie Daniel v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  2. In re Carrier IQ, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
  3. In re Conagra Foods, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2015
  4. Cholakyan v. MERCEDES-BENZ USA, LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2011
  5. In re Nexus 6P Prods. Liab. Litig.District Court, N.D. California · 2018

85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API