Legal Opinion

Spicer, Watson & Carp v. Minnesota Lawyers Mutual Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 6, 1993No. C2-92-2130PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NORTON, Judge.

Respondent Larry Larson sued Peter Watson and respondent Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. for mismanaging a trust which named Larson as the beneficiary. Appellant Minnesota Lawyers Mutual Insurance Company (MLM) reluctantly agreed to defend Watson, indicating its view that Watson’s behavior had been fraudulent. Watson then commenced a declaratory judgment action to compel MLM to fully defend him. The trial court awarded attorney fees to Watson because MLM acted in bad faith. We reverse.

FACTS

As a result of the settlement of a personal injury lawsuit brought by Larry Larson, a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Uselman v. UselmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  2. Morrison v. SwensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  3. Lanoue v. Fireman's Fund American Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  4. Jostens, Inc. v. Mission Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  5. Garrick v. Northland Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Diocese of Winona v. Interstate Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
  2. In Re Silicone Implant Insurance Coverage LitigationCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
  3. American Standard Insurance Co. v. Dang Van LeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
  4. Employers Reinsurance Corp. v. Mid-Continent Casualty Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API