Legal Opinion

Morrison v. Swenson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 13, 1966No. 39660PublishedCited by 87 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Knutson, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered in favor of defendant and third-party plaintiff, George J. Aumer, and from an order of the district court denying a motion of third-party defendant Arrow Insurance Company for an order amending its findings of fact and conclusions of law, or in the alternative granting a new trial.

Taking the view of the evidence most favorable to the court’s findings, as we must, it appears that in November 1962 George J. Aumer owned two automobiles which he and his wife used. His son, Paul Aumer, who was then 18 years old, owned a 1957 Buick,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Kausal v. Minnesota Farmers' Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
  2. Kilborn v. Prudential InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  3. Koivisto v. Bankers & Merchants Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  4. Rommel v. New Brunswick Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  5. Stickney v. GowardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by87 opinions

  1. Upland Mutual Insurance, Inc. v. NoelSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  2. SCSC Corp. v. Allied Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  3. Brown v. State Automobile & Casualty UnderwritersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  4. Domtar, Inc. v. Niagara Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  5. Lanoue v. Fireman's Fund American Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979

82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API