Legal Opinion
Arthur N. ARONSEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CROWN ZELLERBACH, a Corporation, Defendant-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 23, 1981No. 78-1621PublishedCited by 134 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TANG, Circuit Judge:
This is an appeal from the dismissal of an action brought under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-634 (ADEA). On motion for summary judgment, the district court dismissed the action on the ground that Plaintiff Aron-sen’s “notice of intent to sue” was untimely filed with the Secretary of Labor, thus, failing to satisfy a prerequisite to suit under the ADEA. Because the determination of the date on which the unlawful act occurred is not free of factual dispute, we reverse.
I
Plaintiff Aronsen worked as a Research Associate for Crown Zellerbach…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Delaware State College v. RicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Tennessee Valley Authority v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Lorillard v. PonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Reiter v. Sonotone Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by134 opinions
- Lukovsky v. City and County of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Republic of Nicaragua, a Foreign Sovereign v. Standard Fruit Company, Standard Fruit and Steamship Company, and Castle & Cooke, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Hutchinson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Harold R. PRICE, Appellant, v. LITTON BUSINESS SYSTEMS, INC., AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
- Harry L. DILLMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COMBUSTION ENGINEERING, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
129 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.