Legal Opinion

Hutchinson v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 26, 1982No. 79-4542PublishedCited by 152 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SNEED, Circuit Judge:

Taxpayer/appellant Hutchinson 1 appeals pro se from the district court’s dismissal of his claims for refund of asserted overpayments, for declaratory and injunctive relief and for damages against the Commissioner and his employees in both their individual and official capacities. Our jurisdiction arises under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. The district court found that there were no genuine issues of material fact and granted the government’s motion for summary judgment. We affirm.

I

STATEMENT OF FACTS

Hutchinson filed an individual income tax return for 1970 which showed a tax liability…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Butz v. EconomouSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Larson v. Domestic and Foreign Commerce Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. Flora v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by152 opinions

  1. Gilbert v. DaGrossaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  2. Gilbert v. DagrossaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  3. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. SchafferCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
  4. Marshall J. Orloff, M.D. v. Max Cleland, as Administrator, of the Veterans AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  5. Edward J. Kaffenberger Cora S. Kaffenberger v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003

147 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API