Legal Opinion
McGee v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 21, 2009No. Civil Action 07-2310(RMU)PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
RICARDO M. URBINA, District Judge.
Denying the Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Amend and Dismissing the Plaintiff’s Complaint Sua Sponte Based on Res Judicata
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter is before the court on the plaintiffs motion for leave to amend the complaint. The plaintiff seeks to supplement the Title VII claims asserted in his original complaint with claims for violation of the D.C. Whistleblower Act, D.C.Code §§ 1-615.51 et seq., breach of contract and intentional infliction of emotional distress (“IIED”). The plaintiff also seeks to supplement the Title VII claims…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Myrna O'Dell Firestone v. Leonard K. FirestoneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Christopher Owens Cynthia Hutchins,plaintiffs-Appellants v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan,inc., a California Corporation,defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- James Madison Limited, by Norman F. Hecht, Sr., Assignee v. Eugene A. Ludwig, Comptroller of the CurrencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Peters v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- United States ex rel. Westrick v. Second Chance Body Armor, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013
- Fenwick v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Fenwick v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Presidential Bank, Fsb v. 1733 27th Street Se LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.