In Re Rail Freight Fuel Surcharge Antitrust Litigation
District Court, District of Columbia
This document relates to Direct Purchaser, Plaintiffs.
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on defendants’ motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 1 The Court has carefully considered the arguments made by the parties in their papers and the oral arguments presented by counsel in court on October 10, 2008. The Court has concluded that plaintiffs have stated a claim under the test announced by the Supreme Court in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 127 S.Ct. 1955, 167 L.Ed.2d 929 (2007). Accordingly,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Dolly Kyle Browning and Direct Outstanding Creations Corporation v. William Jefferson ClintonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- In Re Rail Freight Fuel Surcharge Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013
- In re Libor-Based Financial Instruments Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Rail Freight Fuel Surcharge Antitrust Litig. - MDL No. 1896 v. BNSF Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- In Re RAIL FREIGHT FUEL SURCHARGE ANTITRUST LITIGATIONDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Hinds County, Miss. v. Wachovia Bank, NADistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.