Gerue v. Industrial Commission
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFritz, J.
The ultimate question in controversy is the amount of the compensation to which plaintiff is entitled by reason of personal injuries and resulting disability which he sustained while in the service of the Medford Bridge Company. It is undisputed that plaintiff sustained eight and one-half weeks of temporary total disability. In addition the Industrial Commission found that he “has and will suffer further disability, for which he will be adequately compensated by payment to him of compensation on the basis of temporary partial disability of fifty per cent, of total disability for the period of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Tesch v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
- City of Milwaukee v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
- Thomson v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
- Cointe v. Congregation of St. John the BaptistWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
- Laney v. RicardoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1919
3Cited by10 opinions
- Woodard v. MordecaiSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Goranson v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Edge v. City of PierreSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
- Sheehan v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
- Knobbe v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.