C. R. Meyer & Sons Co. v. Industrial Commission
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDoerfler, J.
The question to be determined in this case is whether under the provisions of the written contract and of all the other facts and circumstances in the case Grady was an employee of the plaintiff and therefore entitled to compensation, or whether he was an independent contractor. The circuit court based its judgment exclusively upon the terms of the written contract and held that Grady was an independent contractor; that under the terms of the contract McAbee & Grady, for a certain consideration, were to furnish not only the crusher, but also two men to- operate the machine; and that the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Milwaukee Western Fuel Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
- City of Milwaukee v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
- Madix v. Hochgreve Brewing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
- Wausau Lumber Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1917
3Cited by16 opinions
- Badger Furniture Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
- Myers v. Workmen's Compensation CommissionerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1966
- Green Valley Co-Operative Dairy Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
- Employers Mutual Liability Insurance v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
- Dahl v. WunderlichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.