Legal Opinion

Curtin v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 31, 2006No. 114, September Term, 2005PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBattaglia, J.

Petitioner, Raymond Alan Curtin, asks us to determine whether the trial court abused its discretion when it refused to ask his proposed jury voir dire question, “Does anyone have any strong feelings concerning the use of handguns that they would be unable to render a fair and impartial verdict based on the evidence?”1 We hold that, because the question was not one that, if answered in the affirmative, would have provided a basis for a strike for cause in the instant case, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the requested voir dire question and therefore affirm the judgment…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Wainwright v. WittSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Swain v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Casey v. Roman Catholic ArchbishopCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1958
  4. Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  5. Dingle v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Pearson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
  2. State v. LoganCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  3. Moore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  4. Stewart v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  5. Charles and Drake v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API