Legal Opinion
Dingle v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided September 15, 2000No. 87, Sept. Term, 1999PublishedCited by 86 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BELL, Chief Judge.
The issue this case presents,1 which involves the voir dire process, had its genesis in the Circuit Court for Baltimore County, in the trial, for robbery with a dangerous and deadly weapon and related charges, of the petitioner, Ricky Dingle and two co-defendants.2 During the voir dire process, the petitioner sought to have the trial court inquire of the venire panel whether any of them had certain experiences or associations.3 While the court agreed to, and did, make the inquiries the petitioner requested, it did so by joining with each of the petitioner’s requested…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Wainwright v. WittSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Purkett v. ElemSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Adams v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Glanzer v. . ShepardNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
- United States v. Fred Eubanks, Eugene Martinez, Leroy Jones, Henry D. YanezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by86 opinions
- Flowers v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2007
- Borchardt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- State v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- Owens v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- State of Iowa v. Antoine Tyree WilliamsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2019
81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.