Pearson v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtWatts, J.
We decide whether, on request, a trial court must ask during voir dire whether any prospective juror has ever been: (I) the victim of a crime; or (II) a member of a law enforcement agency.
We hold that: (I) a trial court need not ask during voir dire whether any prospective juror has ever been the victim of a crime, but, on request, a trial court must ask during voir dire: “Do any of you have strong feelings about [the crime with which the defendant is charged]?”; and (II) where all of the State’s witnesses are members of law enforcement agencies and/or where the basis for a conviction is…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Maryland v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
- State v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Dingle v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- State v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Kazadi v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
- Harris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018
- Webb v. Giant of MarylandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
- Brice v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2015
- State v. JordanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.