Legal Opinion

Pearson v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 21, 2014No. 49/13PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWatts, J.

We decide whether, on request, a trial court must ask during voir dire whether any prospective juror has ever been: (I) the victim of a crime; or (II) a member of a law enforcement agency.

We hold that: (I) a trial court need not ask during voir dire whether any prospective juror has ever been the victim of a crime, but, on request, a trial court must ask during voir dire: “Do any of you have strong feelings about [the crime with which the defendant is charged]?”; and (II) where all of the State’s witnesses are members of law enforcement agencies and/or where the basis for a conviction is…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Maryland v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  2. Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  3. State v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  4. Dingle v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  5. State v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Kazadi v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
  2. Harris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018
  3. Webb v. Giant of MarylandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
  4. Brice v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2015
  5. State v. JordanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API