Charles and Drake v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtBattaglia, J.
We are asked to consider whether Dwayne Drake and Jamal Charles, Petitioners, are entitled to a new trial, because the judge who presided over their joint trial propounded a question during voir dire asking whether the jury could not “convict” them without “scientific evidence.”
Drake and Charles were tried together before a jury in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City on charges stemming from the death of Bryant Jones and were convicted of second-degree murder and use of a handgun in a felony or crime of violence. Drake was also convicted of wearing, carrying, or transporting a handgun. 1…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Goff v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. HutchinsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
- Foster v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- Dingle v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- Corens v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Commonwealth v. PerezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2011
- State v. StringfellowCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
- Wagner v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2013
- Ingram v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
- McFadden and Miles v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2011
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.