Legal Opinion

Charles and Drake v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 18, 2010No. 110, 114 September Term, 2009PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBattaglia, J.

We are asked to consider whether Dwayne Drake and Jamal Charles, Petitioners, are entitled to a new trial, because the judge who presided over their joint trial propounded a question during voir dire asking whether the jury could not “convict” them without “scientific evidence.”

Drake and Charles were tried together before a jury in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City on charges stemming from the death of Bryant Jones and were convicted of second-degree murder and use of a handgun in a felony or crime of violence. Drake was also convicted of wearing, carrying, or transporting a handgun. 1…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Goff v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. HutchinsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  3. Foster v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  4. Dingle v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  5. Corens v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PerezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2011
  2. State v. StringfellowCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  3. Wagner v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  4. Ingram v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  5. McFadden and Miles v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2011

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API