Legal Opinion

State v. Logan

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided September 1, 2006No. 100, September Term, 2005PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRaker, J.

We granted review to consider two issues in this case. We granted the State’s petition for certiorari to consider whether the trial court acted within its discretion in refusing to pose Logan’s multi-part voir dire questions regarding the defense of not criminally responsible (NCR) and the potential effect of pretrial publicity. We granted Logan’s cross-petition to consider whether the trial court’s error in admitting into evidence his confession in violation of Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966), was harmless error.

I

James Ramiah Logan was indicted by the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Mu'Min v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Dorsey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  5. Rogers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Dove v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  2. Moore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  3. Kazadi v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
  4. Stewart v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  5. Charles and Drake v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API