Legal Opinion

Stewart v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 11, 2007No. 81, September Term, 2006PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRaker, J.

In this criminal case alleging child abuse and sexual offenses, we must decide whether the trial court erred in declining to ask certain voir dire questions proposed by defense counsel. We shall hold that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in declining to ask the questions submitted by counsel, and we shall affirm.

I

Appellant, David Stewart, was indicted by the Grand Jury for Prince George’s County in a multi-count indictment alleging child abuse, second degree sexual offense, third degree sexual offense, and fourth degree sexual offense. He proceeded to trial before a jury and was…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Mu'Min v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Rosales-Lopez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Turner v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Standefer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001
  5. Casey v. Roman Catholic ArchbishopCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1958

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Moore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  2. Kazadi v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
  3. Charles and Drake v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  4. State v. ShimCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
  5. Washington v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API