Canfield v. Sandock
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
HOFFMAN, Judge.
Appellant David J. Canfield, Jr. appeals a jury trial judgment in favor of Melvin and Betty Sandock. The facts indicate that as a result of an automobile-pedestrian accident on October 23, 1986, Melvin and Betty Sandock filed a complaint for negligence against Canfield alleging that Melvin “suf*1238fered temporary and permanent physical injury, temporary and permanent pain and suffering, mental suffering, medical expenses and economic loss.” The complaint also alleged that Betty suffered a loss of consortium. Canfield v. Sandock (1988), Ind.App., 521 N.E.2d 704, 705 (transfer…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- McDougald v. GarberNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Willinger v. Mercy Catholic Medical CenterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Flannery v. United StatesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
- Dunn v. CadienteIndiana Supreme Court · 1987
- Antcliff v. DatzmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Canfield v. SandockIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
- Canfield v. SandockIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
- Canfield v. SandockIndiana Court of Appeals · 1989
- Seifert v. BlandIndiana Court of Appeals · 1989
- Seifert v. BlandIndiana Court of Appeals · 1989