Canfield v. Sandock
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
546 N.E.2d 1237 (1989)
David J. CANFIELD, Jr., Appellant (Defendant below),
v.
Melvin H. SANDOCK and Betty J. Sandock, Appellees (Plaintiffs below).
No. 71A03-8809-CV-274.
Court of Appeals of Indiana, Third District.
December 4, 1989.
Arthur A. May, Robert J. Palmer, Wendell W. Walsh, May, Oberfell & Lorber, South Bend, for appellant.
Robert F. Gonderman, Sr., Robert F. Gonderman, Jr., Gonderman Law Offices, P.C., South Bend, for appellees.
HOFFMAN, Judge.
Appellant David J. Canfield, Jr. appeals a jury trial judgment in favor of Melvin and Betty Sandock. The facts indicate that as a result of an…
Also in this document: Dissent · Staton; Dissent · Staton; Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited19 opinions
- McDougald v. GarberNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Willinger v. Mercy Catholic Medical CenterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Flannery v. United StatesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
- Dunn v. CadienteIndiana Supreme Court · 1987
- Davison v. WilliamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1968
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.