Legal Opinion
Canfield v. Sandock
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided November 27, 1990No. 71S03-9011-CV-745PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DeBRULER, Justice.
This cause had its origin in an automobile-pedestrian accident which resulted in personal injury to the pedestrian, Melvin Sandock. Sandock filed a suit for damages against David J. Canfield, the driver of the car, alleging “temporary and permanent physical injury, temporary and permanent pain and suffering, mental suffering, medical expenses and economic loss.” The complaint also alleged that Sandock’s wife suffered a loss of consortium.
By way of interrogatories, Canfield requested the following medical information: 1) the names, addresses, and appointment dates of “each…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Masonic Mutual Benefit Ass'n v. BeckIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Collins v. BairIndiana Supreme Court · 1969
- Chustak v. Northern Indiana Public Service Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1972
- State Ex Rel. Pollard v. Criminal Ct. of Marion Cty.Indiana Supreme Court · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- McCullough v. Archbold Ladder Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1993
- Outback Steakhouse of Florida, Inc. v. MarkleyIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
- Hayworth v. Schilli Leasing, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1996
- In Re Wthr-TvIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
- Terre Haute Regional Hospital, Inc. v. TruebloodIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.