Legal Opinion
Canfield v. Sandock
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided November 27, 1990No. 71S03-9011-CV-745Published
1Opinion of the Court
563 N.E.2d 526 (1990)
David J. CANFIELD, Jr., Appellant,
v.
Melvin H. SANDOCK and Betty J. Sandock, Appellee.
No. 71S03-9011-CV-745.
Supreme Court of Indiana.
November 27, 1990.
Rehearing Denied February 11, 1991.
Robert J. Palmer, Arthur A. May, May, Oberfell & Lorber, South Bend, for appellant.
Robert F. Gonderman, Sr., Gonderman Law Offices, P.C., South Bend, for appellee.
DeBRULER, Justice.
This cause had its origin in an automobile-pedestrian accident which resulted in personal injury to the pedestrian, Melvin Sandock. Sandock filed a suit for damages against David J. Canfield, the driver of the…
Also in this document: Dissent; Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Masonic Mutual Benefit Ass'n v. BeckIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Canfield v. SandockIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
- Collins v. BairIndiana Supreme Court · 1969
- Chustak v. Northern Indiana Public Service Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1972
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.