Legal Opinion

Gambrell v. McKean

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1925No. Civil No. 2315PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.

In December, 1918, Molarkas Mining Company, hereinafter called the company, executed several promissory notes to itself as payee, aggregating the sum of seventeen thousand dollars ($17,000). John P. McKean, S. D. Douthitt, P. J. Schemp, A. B. Finke, A. P. James, Robert McReynolds, O. W. Haines, Ralph Goldsticker, and Moe Furth, hereinafter called plaintiffs, and W. E. Gambrell, hereinafter called defendant, were at the time all stockholders of the company, and they each and all signed the notes as accommodation indorsers, afterwards delivering them to three banks in Missouri. The purpose of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Chipman v. Morill & WebsterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
  2. Trego v. Estate of CunninghamIllinois Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Hagenauer v. Detroit Copper Mining Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Mateer v. CockrillCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1898
  5. Comstock v. PotterMichigan Supreme Court · 1916

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Daniel v. City of TucsonArizona Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Mitchell v. Vulture Mining & Milling Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Mitchell v. Vulture Mining & Milling Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API