Legal Opinion

Daniel v. City of Tucson

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 23, 1938No. Civil No. 3976PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.

On August 20, 1935, Maria Y. de Cruz filed a complaint against the City of Tucson alleging that the city had constructed and was maintaining a system of drains and culverts, which, together with accumulated debris, on August 21, 1933, caused the natural flow of the waters in the vicinity of plaintiff’s property to be changed so as to throw quantities thereof onto her property, to her damage in the sum of $3,000. The damaged property was described as follows: “Lot 6 of Block 2 of Elysian Grove Subdivision of part of Lot 6 in Block 243 of City of Tucson. . . . ” Thereafter, on February 24,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Fields v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  2. Hagenauer v. Detroit Copper Mining Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Bryan v. Inspiration Consolidated Copper Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Boudreaux v. Tucson Gas, Electric Light & Power Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Kunselman v. Southern Pacific RailroadArizona Supreme Court · 1928

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Edgar T. Weekes v. Atlantic National Ins. Co., California State Auto Association v. Atlantic National Ins. Co., Atlantic National Ins. Co. v. California State Auto AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
  2. Smith v. PinnerArizona Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Malta v. Phoenix Title & Trust Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Ocean A. G. Corp., Ltd. v. U.S.F. G. Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Ocean Accident & Guaranty Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1945

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API