Legal Opinion

Marshall v. LaBoi

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 18, 1954No. Civ. 15420PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.

The litigants involved in the various appeals here presented are:

Frank S. Marshall, a general contractor engaged in the building construction business, a respondent.

Wurster, Bernardi & Emmons, a copartnership of architects, and respondents.

Sam F. Termini and Alyce C. Termini, husband and wife, who built a home in Hillsborough, and who, directly or indirectly, employed Marshall as contractor, and the Wurster partnership, as architects, to design and construct the house. The Terminis are appellants herein.

Jesse LaBoi, nephew of the Terminis, and world war veteran, also an appellant.

The house…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Zibbell v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Norwood v. JuddCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  3. McAllister v. DrapeauCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Severance v. Knight-Counihan Co.California Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Young v. HamptonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Tri-Q, Inc. v. Sta-Hi Corp.California Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Ulwelling v. Crown Coach Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1962
  3. Castro v. SanglesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  4. Holland v. Morgan & Peacock Properties Co.California Court of Appeal · 1959
  5. Cain v. BurnsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API