Legal Opinion

McAllister v. Drapeau

California Supreme Court

Decided July 27, 1939No. L. A. 16595PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

Defendant appeals from a judgment cancelling a promissory note and deed of trust executed by plaintiffs, and from a money judgment in favor of plaintiffs for the sums paid by them on the note.

The facts are not in dispute, and are as follows:

In 1929 plaintiffs borrowed from the California Security Loan Corporation, appellant’s predecessor in interest, the sum of $11,050, which debt was secured by a first deed of trust on plaintiffs’ home property. By the year 1934 this indebtedness had been reduced to $8,271.26. In that year plaintiffs defaulted on their payments on the note, and, as…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Daniels v. TearneySupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Kay v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Smith v. BachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Meek v. WilsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Cook v. DonnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. Lewis & Queen v. N. M. Ball SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Carter v. Seaboard Finance Co.California Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Severance v. Knight-Counihan Co.California Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Contractor's Safety Ass'n v. California Compensation InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Shiver v. Liberty Building-Loan Assn.California Supreme Court · 1940

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API