Legal Opinion
Young v. Hampton
California Supreme Court
Decided March 9, 1951No. L. A. 21471PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.
Helen Young, a contractor, sued to enforce a mechanic’s lien for the construction of a house for William J. Hampton and Alice C. Hampton. The trial court found that the work had been performed pursuant to a cost-plus agreement, awarded Young a lien for the unpaid balance due under the contract, and directed foreclosure if the debt is not discharged.
According to the settled statement on appeal, the material facts are as follows: William and Alice Hampton discussed with Helen Young the matter of building a house for them. William told her that he is a veteran of World War II. To aid the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Karrell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
- McAllister v. DrapeauCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Young v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
- Diamond v. WillettLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1948
- United States v. SelphDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1949
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- People v. BeagleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Hampton v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- By-Buk Co. v. Printed Cellophane Tape Co.California Court of Appeal · 1958
- Glosser v. PowersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
- Miller v. Superior Court in and for County of PimaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.