Legal Opinion

Daubert v. Borough of Naugatuck

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided August 20, 2002No. AC 21701PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BISHOP, J.

The plaintiff, Michael Daubert, appeals from the decision of the workers’ compensation review board (board) affirming the commissioner’s decision to dismiss his claim for benefits due to injuries suffered in an accident while on patrol as a police officer. The plaintiff claims that the board improperly affirmed the commissioner’s decision because the commissioner’s findings established that the claim was compensable. We agree because the only reasonable inference that can be drawn from the commissioner’s factual findings is that the plaintiffs injuries arose out of and in the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Gartrell v. Department of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
  2. Russell v. Mystic Seaport Museum, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  3. Kolomiets v. Syncor International Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  4. Dengler v. Special Attention Health Services, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  5. Grabowski v. MiskellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cable v. Bic Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  2. Brinson v. Finlay Bros. Printing Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2003
  3. Sellers v. Sellers Garage, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2003
  4. Daubert v. Borough of NaugatuckSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  5. State v. NicholsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API