Legal Opinion
Daubert v. Borough of Naugatuck
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 17, 2004No. SC 16848PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BORDEN, J.
The sole issue in this certified appeal is whether there was a reasonable basis in the facts found for the workers’ compensation commissioner to have determined that the plaintiff had not met his burden of proving that he was injured during the course of his employment. The defendants, the borough of Naugatuck and its insurer, the Hartford Insurance Group, appeal, following our grant of certification, from the judgment of the Appellate Court reversing the decision of the compensation review board (board) in their favor. The defendants claim that the Appellate Court improperly…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Fair v. People's Savings BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Spatafore v. Yale UniversitySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Kolomiets v. Syncor International Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Daubert v. Borough of NaugatuckConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Daubert v. Borough of NaugatuckSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
3Cited by9 opinions
- SAPKO v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
- Blakeslee v. PLATT BROS. AND CO.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Birnie v. Electric Boat Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Cable v. Bic Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Rodriguez v. E.D. Construction, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.