Grabowski v. Miskell
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Superior Court in Hartford County, Máltbie, J., which found error in the action of the Compensation Commissioner of the fifth district, acting for and in place of the Commissioner of the first district, in reopening a former award and in dismissing the claim of the plaintiff.
1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, C. J.
The Superior Court sustained the plaintiff’s appeal from the Commissioner for his errors in denying the first and third grounds of plaintiff’s motion to correct, and in reopening the award, determining the case de novo and dismissing the claim.
The appeal of the defendant from the judgment of the Superior Court assigns as error the sustaining of the appeal; and this brings before us the court’s decision granting the first and third grounds of plaintiff’s motion to correct, and its holding that the Commissioner could not open the award and try the case de novo.
In order to pass upon these…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Fair v. Hartford Rubber Works Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
3Cited by21 opinions
- Southeastern Express Co. v. EdmondsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- Marone v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Gonirenki v. American Steel & Wire Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
- Hayden v. R. Wallace & Sons Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
- Kearns v. City of TorringtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.