Legal Opinion
State v. Nicholson
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 22, 2004No. AC 24062PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
2Per curiam
The defendant, Allan Nicholson, appeals from the judgment of conviction of robbery in *440the third degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-136, rendered on remand to the trial court as directed by our decision in State v. Nicholson, 71 Conn. App. 585, 803 A.2d 391, cert. denied, 261 Conn. 941, 808 A.2d 1134 (2002). On appeal, the defendant claims that the court should not have followed the remand order because it deprived him of his constitutional rights to a fair trial. We cannot agree.
We set forth a complete statement of the facts in State v. Nicholson, supra, 71 Conn. App.…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. AleksiewiczConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
- State v. NicholsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- State v. LaffertySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Daubert v. Borough of NaugatuckConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- State v. LaffertySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
4Cited by5 opinions
- Nicholson v. LenczewskiDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2005
- Nicholson v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Edwards v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- Nicholson v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- State v. NicholsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004