Legal Opinion

Cornwell v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided October 6, 1982No. 81-756PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant, convicted of the attempted breaking and entering of a vending machine, received an enhanced sentence as a repeat offender pursuant to D.C.Code 1973, § 22-104(a). He argues on appeal that, because he committed the offense which formed the basis for the enhanced penalty after the crime for which he received the enhanced sentence, the court erred in sentencing him as a repeat offender. We reject this contention and conclude that a prior conviction, regardless of the date of the commission of the underlying crime, is sufficient to trigger the repeat offender sentencing provisions of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
  2. United States v. BridgemanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
  3. Charles R. Warren v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
  4. United States v. HilliardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People v. SnookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Gargliano v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  3. Holiday v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. State v. AllisonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  5. Hawkins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API