United States v. Hilliard
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
This is an appeal by the government pursuant to D.C.Code 1973, § 23-111(d) (2). 1 The government contends that because appellee had previously been convicted of a crime of violence, the court wrongfully placed him on probation and, instead, was required, under the provisions of D.C.Code 1973 § 22-3202, to sentence him to a minimum term of imprisonment, without suspension of sentence or probation. We agree and remand for resentenc-ing.
On April 7, 1975, appellee was found guilty by a jury of assault with intent to commit robbery while armed 2 and two counts of armed robbery. 3 On July 11, 1975,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- United States v. BridgemanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
3Cited by7 opinions
- Sanker v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
- People v. NeesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
- Garrett v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1984
- Fields v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Cornwell v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.