Legal Opinion

United States v. Hilliard

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided November 9, 1976No. 10119PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal by the government pursuant to D.C.Code 1973, § 23-111(d) (2). 1 The government contends that because appellee had previously been convicted of a crime of violence, the court wrongfully placed him on probation and, instead, was required, under the provisions of D.C.Code 1973 § 22-3202, to sentence him to a minimum term of imprisonment, without suspension of sentence or probation. We agree and remand for resentenc-ing.

On April 7, 1975, appellee was found guilty by a jury of assault with intent to commit robbery while armed 2 and two counts of armed robbery. 3 On July 11, 1975,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. BridgemanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sanker v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. People v. NeesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
  3. Garrett v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  4. Fields v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Cornwell v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API