Legal Opinion

Holiday v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided July 30, 1996No. 95-CF-1054, 95-CF-1390, 95-SP-1457 and 95-SP-1467PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FERREN, Associate Judge:

These consolidated cases present a common issue requiring interpretation of the 1995 statute that repealed mandatory-minimum sentences for certain nonviolent drug offenses. We must determine whether the mandatory-minimum sentencing provisions apply when the offense was committed before — but the defendant was sentenced after — the effective date of the repealing legislation. In addition, appellants Holiday and Park argue that a variety of errors during their respective trials — including issues of severance, other crimes evidence, and the constitutionality of the…

2Cases cited107 opinions

  1. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Heller v. Doe Ex Rel. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. MurgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798

102 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. State v. KaneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  2. State v. KaneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  3. Harrison v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. Tyer v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. State v. ReisHawaii Supreme Court · 2007

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API