Legal Opinion

Gargliano v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 13, 1994No. 71, September Term, 1993PublishedCited by 88 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAKER, Judge.

In this appeal we are again called upon to construe a criminal statute which requires the imposition of an enhanced penalty on certain repeat offenders. Maryland Code (1957, 1992 Repl.Vol.) Article 27, § 286(c) of the controlled dangerous substances laws provides that a defendant who “previously has been convicted” of a similar offense is subject to a sentence of not less than ten years imprisonment. We are asked here to determine whether the enhanced penalty mandated by § 286(c) 1 is triggered when a defendant is convicted of a prior offense after the commission of, but before…

2Cases cited77 opinions

  1. Parke v. RaleySupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Rewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Ladner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Deal v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Kaczorowski v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by88 opinions

  1. Degren v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  2. Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  3. Armstead v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  4. Deville v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  5. Lewis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998

83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API